diff --git a/A1/graphs/outint.dat b/A1/graphs/outint.dat new file mode 100644 index 0000000..573991b --- /dev/null +++ b/A1/graphs/outint.dat @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +N a b INT T diff --git a/A1/graphs/outpi.dat b/A1/graphs/outpi.dat new file mode 100644 index 0000000..97bdbc7 --- /dev/null +++ b/A1/graphs/outpi.dat @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +N PI T diff --git a/A2/assignment2 b/A2/assignment2 index 4da2e64..37827df 100755 Binary files a/A2/assignment2 and b/A2/assignment2 differ diff --git a/A2/execute_ancarola.sh b/A2/execute_ancarola.sh index 48a123e..5b955e6 100755 --- a/A2/execute_ancarola.sh +++ b/A2/execute_ancarola.sh @@ -1,26 +1,22 @@ #!/bin/bash #SBATCH --chdir /scratch/ancarola #SBATCH --nodes 1 #SBATCH --ntasks 1 #SBATCH --cpus-per-task 16 #SBATCH --mem 2G #SBATCH --partition serial #SBATCH --account cs307 #SBATCH --reservation CS307-ex echo STARTING AT `date` user=ancarola wdir="/home/$user/multiproc/A2" -if [ -f "./assignment2" ]; then - ln -s "$wdir/assignment2" -fi - Ntr="1 2 4 8 16" for ntr in $Ntr; do ./assignment2 $ntr 10000 100 /dev/null done echo FINISHED at `date` diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836895.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836895.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..593db5f --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836895.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:33:40 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 54.82 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 27.7 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 13.98 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 7.097 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 4.473 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:35:30 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836916.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836916.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6aa753f --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836916.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:36:34 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 54.82 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 27.66 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 13.94 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 7.212 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 4.161 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:38:24 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836917.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836917.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6ea38a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836917.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:36:35 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 54.86 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 27.67 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 13.93 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 7.303 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 5.076 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:38:26 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836918.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836918.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..afc506d --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836918.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:36:35 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 54.85 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 27.67 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 13.93 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 7.094 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 5.756 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:38:27 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836919.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836919.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e10cf4a --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836919.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:36:35 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 54.91 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 27.66 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 13.93 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 7.086 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 5.232 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:38:26 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836920.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836920.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5522822 --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836920.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:36:35 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 54.86 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 27.67 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 13.94 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 7.112 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 6.18 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:38:27 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836921.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836921.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7e35693 --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836921.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:36:35 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 54.83 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 27.61 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 13.96 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 7.047 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 5.27 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:38:26 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836922.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836922.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..72d65cc --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836922.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:36:35 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 54.7 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 27.38 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 13.73 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 6.911 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 3.916 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:38:24 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836923.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836923.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6310fff --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836923.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:36:35 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 54.82 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 27.47 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 13.79 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 6.948 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 3.937 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:38:24 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836924.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836924.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7b493ae --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836924.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:36:35 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 39.19 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 19.67 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 10.41 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 5.335 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 6.481 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:37:58 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836925.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836925.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..17202c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836925.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:36:35 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 39.26 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 19.74 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 10.41 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 5.576 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 5.067 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:37:57 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836926.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836926.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c5a4ea5 --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836926.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:36:35 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 39.38 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 19.65 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 10.37 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 6.725 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 6.127 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:37:59 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836927.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836927.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1c8f4ef --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836927.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:36:35 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 39.24 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 19.88 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 10.59 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 6.112 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 3.322 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:37:56 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836928.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836928.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2fb929e --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836928.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:36:35 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 39.3 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 20.2 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 10.53 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 5.438 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 6.195 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:37:59 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836929.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836929.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..17d54e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836929.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:36:35 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 39.4 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 20.75 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 10.63 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 5.47 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 3.588 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:37:57 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836930.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836930.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4c736ed --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836930.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:36:35 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 39.37 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 21.49 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 10.77 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 5.395 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 3.09 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:37:57 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836931.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836931.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..cf4ecbb --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836931.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:36:35 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 39.35 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 21.3 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 10.78 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 5.399 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 2.972 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:37:57 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836932.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836932.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ed3aa0f --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836932.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:36:35 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 42.74 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 21.8 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 10.93 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 5.535 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 3.198 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:38:01 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836933.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836933.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..909b987 --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836933.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:36:35 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 42.6 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 21.78 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 10.79 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 5.502 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 3.405 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:38:01 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836934.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836934.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d63fbc9 --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836934.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:36:35 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 39.17 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 19.72 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 10.44 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 10.32 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 9.636 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:38:06 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836935.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836935.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3c9b03a --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836935.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:36:35 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 54.83 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 27.89 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 14.02 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 6.996 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 4.639 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:38:26 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836936.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836936.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..373c983 --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836936.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:37:09 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 54.83 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 27.45 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 13.86 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 6.991 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 4.487 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:38:59 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836937.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836937.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0e45d34 --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836937.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:37:09 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 55.01 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 27.97 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 13.82 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 7.001 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 5.748 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:39:01 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836938.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836938.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bd6d427 --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836938.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:37:09 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 55.02 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 27.51 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 13.81 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 7.825 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 6.213 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:39:02 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836939.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836939.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c5910e6 --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836939.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:37:09 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 55.21 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 27.51 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 13.88 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 7.012 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 5.564 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:39:01 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836940.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836940.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..063557d --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836940.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:37:09 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 54.88 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 27.91 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 13.99 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 7.001 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 4.516 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:39:00 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836941.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836941.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..46b04a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836941.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:37:09 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 54.93 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 27.63 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 13.86 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 7.029 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 6.045 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:39:01 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836942.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836942.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8e712e9 --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836942.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:37:09 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 54.83 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 27.93 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 13.88 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 7.328 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 6.135 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:39:02 CEST 2020 diff --git a/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836943.out b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836943.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9d99d52 --- /dev/null +++ b/A2/graph/tests/slurm-5836943.out @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +STARTING AT Wed Oct 21 18:37:09 CEST 2020 +Running the algorithm with 1 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 54.86 seconds +Running the algorithm with 2 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 27.9 seconds +Running the algorithm with 4 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 13.89 seconds +Running the algorithm with 8 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 7.034 seconds +Running the algorithm with 16 threads on 10000 by 10000 array for 100 iterations took 6.256 seconds +FINISHED at Wed Oct 21 18:39:01 CEST 2020