Homec4science
Diffusion Motion HCP analysis (master) Browse

MOT_ANA/Matlab_Scripts/Script_Motion_Revision_Validation.m
854ba9392397master

Last Change
Raw File

Script_Motion_Revision_Validation.m
View Options

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% Author: Thomas Bolton
% Date: 23/10/2019
% Description:
% This script runs motion and behavior analyses on an extended set of
% subjects from the Human Connectome Project, in an updated fashion to
% answer the comments from the Reviewers
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%% 1. Loading some of the data and setting paths
% SS contains the parameters for convergence of the probabilistic PCA
% algorithm
load SS
% Adds paths to functions and utilities
addpath(genpath(fullfile(pwd,'GlobalUtilities')));
addpath(genpath(fullfile(pwd,'Functions')));
addpath(genpath('/Users/TiBiUan/Desktop/Github/IBI_Application/HCP_General'));
addpath(genpath('/Users/TiBiUan/Desktop/Github/MOT_ANA/Behavioral_Data_Extended'));
% Do we want to plot stuff or not
is_plot = 1;
%% 4. Flagging scrubbed time points
% Threshold to use for scrubbing (i.e., separating the scrubbed frames from
% the non-scrubbed ones)
T_scrubbing = 0.5;
n_subjects = size(FD_ALL,2);
% Will mask which frames to keep or not to keep for a given subject
TemporalMask_All = [];
for s = 1:n_subjects
TemporalMask_All(:,s) = GetTemporalMask(FD_ALL(:,s),T_scrubbing,1);
end
%% 5. Computing processed motion information (spatiotemporal features)
% number of time bins that we want to split the motion data into: 6 is the
% recommended value.
n_TB = 2;
% Computation of the motion parameters: Motion_Matrix will contain the
% results for session 1
[Motion_Matrix,Motion_Matrix_Pos,Motion_Matrix_Neg,Space_Labels,...
Time_Labels,Session_Labels] = MOT_ANA_ComputeParameters(MM,TemporalMask_All,n_TB);
%% 6. Conversion into "relative to population values"
% Note that we use both session data in this step: indeed, we are
% interested in keeping them in the same space
Motion_Matrix = Motion_Matrix(idx_motion&idx_behavior,:);
n_subjects=size(Motion_Matrix,1);
[MOTION_VAR] = MOT_ANA_Reftopop([Motion_Matrix],'Popref');
%% 7. Low dimensional representation of the spatiotemporal motion data:
% determination of the optimal number of clusters for the combined data
% 10 nearest neighbours for spectral clustering
n_NN = 10;
% Construction of the adjacency matrix reflecting my graph, using
% cosine distance (similar results are obtained using euclidean
% distance): note that the graph is constructed on both session data points
W = construct_knn_graph(MOTION_VAR,n_NN,'cosine');
% Then, I compute the first three dimensions of my new space in which I
% express my data: first I compute the normalized Laplacian of my graph,
% and second, I do an eigenvalue decomposition on this. X, Y and Z are the
% second, third and fourth eigenvectors resulting from the process (that
% is, the "low frequency information" along the graph that links similar
% subjects together
[X,Y,Z,E1,E2,E3] = compute_non_linear_dim_reduction(W);
% Of course, we want to find the optimal data parcellation, and so
% we must derive an optimal number of clusters to use. For this, we
% resort to Consensus Clustering (Monti et al., Machine learning, 2003)
% From here on, we separate session 1 and session 2 data, in the spirit of
% conducting a replicability assessment
[Consensus] = CAP_ConsensusClustering({[X,Y,Z]'},2:50,'items',0.8,100,'cosine');
% Consensus clustering matrices for K ranging from 2 to 17, in both session
% cases
% if is_plot
% figure;
% set(gcf,'color','w');
%
% for j = 1:36
%
% subplot(6,6,j);
% set(gca,'Box');
% axis square
%
% imagesc(squeeze(Consensus(:,:,j)));
%
% end
%
% end
% Calculates the quality metrics to determine the optimal value of
% K: the inter-percentile interval (PAC) is used
[~,Lorena] = ComputeClusteringQuality(Consensus,2:50);
% Assessment of the results
if is_plot
figure;
bar(Lorena);
end
%% 8. Analysis and displays for the chosen, whole data
% Based on the output metrics, the optimal cluster number is
n_clusters = 7;
% Clustering is performed with this optimal value
[IDX] = kmeans([X,Y,Z],n_clusters,'Distance',...
'cosine','Replicates',10000,'Start','sample');
% Figure 1: representation of movers in nonlinearly reduced space
% (paper figure and representation as cluster members)
if is_plot
% Plotting of the whole data
%[F1,F2,F3,F4,F5,F6] = MOTANA_OMFGBBQPlotSimple(MOTION_VAR,X,Y,Z,n_subjects,1.5,500,1,Time_Labels,Space_Labels,'RGB',IDX,[]);
[F1,F2,F3,F4,F5,F6] = MOTANA_OMFGBBQPlotSimple_UCLA(MOTION_VAR,X,Y,Z,size(MOTION_VAR,1),1.5,500,3,Time_Labels,Space_Labels,'Groups',IDX,[]);
[F1,F2,F3,F4,F5,F6] = MOTANA_OMFGBBQPlotSimple_UCLA(MOTION_VAR,X,Y,Z,size(MOTION_VAR,1),1.5,500,3,Time_Labels,Space_Labels,'Groups',Diag,[]);
end
C_UCLA = zeros(n_clusters,6*n_TB);
for k = 1:n_clusters
C_UCLA(k,:) = mean(MOTION_VAR(IDX==k,:));
end
C_UCLA_K4 = zeros(n_clusters,6*n_TB);
for k = 1:n_clusters
C_UCLA_K4(k,:) = mean(MOTION_VAR_UCLA(IDX_K4==k,:));
end
%% 9. Summary of motion along time and space
% Observation: we find similar clusters: although K=4 is a less "clear"
% pick in the latter dataset case
MOT_ANA_SummariseMotion(MOTION_VAR,IDX,Time_Labels,Space_Labels);
[RealCorrs,NullCors] = MOT_ANA_CompareClusters(C_HCP,C_UCLA,'MSE');
[RealCorrs,NullCors] = MOT_ANA_CompareClusters(C_HCP,C_UCLA_K4,'MSE');
%% 12. Preparation of the behavioural data (normalization of each column)
Output = Behav(idx_motion&idx_behavior,:);
% Normalize each column (keeping 'non-existing values')
O2 = Output - repmat(nanmean(Output,1),n_subjects,1);
O2 = O2 ./ repmat(nanstd(O2,1),n_subjects,1);
% Number of missing values
P_missing = sum(sum(isnan(O2)))/size(O2,1)/size(O2,2)*100;
PCA = O2;
%% 15. Univariate assessment of the derived anthropomorphic and
% behavioral features link to motion (whole dataset and separate assessments)
% We compute the Fisher score (and related null distribution when shuffling
% behvior and motion entries with respect to each other) for each feature
% of interest
[F,Fnull] = MOT_LinkBehavMotion(PCA(:,[1:4,6:9,12:17,28,29]),IDX);
% Bonferroni correction for the number of univariate assessments and
% subsequent derivation of significance thresholds
alpha = 5/size(PCA(:,[1:4,6:9,12:17,28,29]),2);
Fthresh = squeeze(prctile(Fnull,100-alpha,2));
% Another attempt using the proposal by Holmes and Nichols (Human Brain
% Mapping, 2001). We compute a distribution based on the max of each score
% null distribution and then, threshold that at 5%
tmp_F = max(Fnull,[],2);
F_Holmes = prctile(tmp_F,100-alpha);
% Yet another attempt using FDR correction
for i = 1:size(PCA(:,[1:4,6:9,12:17,28,29]),2)
tmp = Fnull(i,:);
tmpF = F(i);
pval(i) = sum(tmp > tmpF)/length(tmp);
end
% FDR correction
[h, crit_p]=fdr_bh(pval,0.05);
% Determines the thresold level matching crit_p
for i = 1:size(PCA(:,[1:4,6:9,12:17,28,29]),2)
tmp = Fnull(i,:);
F_FDR(i) = prctile(tmp,100 - 100*crit_p);
end
% Plotting of univariate results
figure;
bar(F);
hold on;
for i = 1:size(PCA(:,[1:4,6:9,12:17,28,29]),2)
plot([i-0.4,i+0.4],[Fthresh(i),Fthresh(i)],'color',[0.3 0.3 0.3],'LineWidth',1.5);
plot([i-0.4,i+0.4],[F_FDR(i),F_FDR(i)],'color',[0.6 0.6 0.6],'LineWidth',1.5);
end
%%
% Indices of the significant variables
idx_uni = [1,7];
% For each, post-hoc comparison across groups
for i = 1:length(idx_uni)
tmp = PCA(:,idx_uni(i));
[p_12(i),~,STATS_12{i}] = ranksum(tmp(IDX == 1),tmp(IDX == 2));
[p_13(i),~,STATS_13{i}] = ranksum(tmp(IDX == 1),tmp(IDX == 3));
[p_14(i),~,STATS_14{i}] = ranksum(tmp(IDX == 1),tmp(IDX == 4));
[p_23(i),~,STATS_23{i}] = ranksum(tmp(IDX == 2),tmp(IDX == 3));
[p_24(i),~,STATS_24{i}] = ranksum(tmp(IDX == 2),tmp(IDX == 4));
[p_34(i),~,STATS_34{i}] = ranksum(tmp(IDX == 3),tmp(IDX == 4));
Delta_12(i) = nanmean(tmp(IDX == 1)) - nanmean(tmp(IDX == 2));
Delta_13(i) = nanmean(tmp(IDX == 1)) - nanmean(tmp(IDX == 3));
Delta_14(i) = nanmean(tmp(IDX == 1)) - nanmean(tmp(IDX == 4));
Delta_23(i) = nanmean(tmp(IDX == 2)) - nanmean(tmp(IDX == 3));
Delta_24(i) = nanmean(tmp(IDX == 2)) - nanmean(tmp(IDX == 4));
Delta_34(i) = nanmean(tmp(IDX == 3)) - nanmean(tmp(IDX == 4));
tmpf = figure;
set(gcf,'color','w');
imagesc([0,Delta_12(i),Delta_13(i),Delta_14(i);...
0,0,Delta_23(i),Delta_24(i);...
0,0,0,Delta_34(i);...
0,0,0,0]);
set(gca,'Box','off');
CM = cbrewer('div','RdBu',1000);
colormap(flipud(CM));
tmp_scale = max(abs([Delta_12(i),Delta_13(i),Delta_14(i),Delta_23(i),...
Delta_24(i),Delta_34(i)]));
caxis([-tmp_scale,tmp_scale]);
axis off
axis square
colorbar
print(tmpf,'-depsc',['UNIV_',num2str(i)]);
close(tmpf);
end
%% 16. Combination of both sides with PLS
[U,V,EV,sprob,BS_U,BS_V,Ub_vect,Vb_vect] = RunPLS(MOTION_VAR,PCA(:,[1:4,6:9,12:17,28,29]));
%% 17. PLS-related plots
% Here, we plot the results of the PLS analysis
% How many components do we want to plot ?
n_comps = 4;
% Latent scores for behaviors for the subjects (how strongly a component is
% expressed in a subject)
Lm = MOTION_VAR*U;
Lm = Lm(:,1:n_comps);
% Latent scores for motion
Lb = PCA(:,[1:4,6:9,12:17,28,29])*V;
Lb = Lb(:,1:n_comps);
for j = 1:n_comps
% Computing the time and space indices for my 36 values
for t = 1:n_TB
Summary_time_PLS(j,t) = mean(U(Time_Labels(t,:),j));
end
for p = 1:6
Summary_position_PLS(j,p) = mean(U(Space_Labels(p,:),j));
end
% Same for my bootstrapping folds
for k = 1:1000
for t = 1:n_TB
Summary_time_boot(j,t,k) = mean(squeeze(Ub_vect(k,Time_Labels(t,:),j)));
end
for p = 1:6
Summary_position_boot(j,p,k) = mean(squeeze(Ub_vect(k,Space_Labels(p,:),j)));
end
end
% Computes standard deviation
V_STD = squeeze(std(Vb_vect,[],1));
U_STDt = squeeze(std(Summary_time_boot,[],3));
U_STDs = squeeze(std(Summary_position_boot,[],3));
% Computes z-scores
U_zt = Summary_time_PLS./U_STDt;
U_zs = Summary_position_PLS./U_STDs;
V_z = V./V_STD;
if is_plot
figure;
set(gcf,'color','w');
bar(1:size(V,1),V_z(:,j));
set(gca,'Box','off');
figure;
set(gcf,'color','w');
subplot(2,1,1);
bar(1:n_TB,U_zt(j,:));
set(gca,'Box','off');
subplot(2,1,2);
bar(1:6,U_zs(j,:));
set(gca,'Box','off');
end
end
%% 18. Understanding how components relate to each other
% For age
for i = 1:n_comps
figure;
set(gcf,'color','w');
scatter(Age2,Lm(:,i),'k.');
set(gca,'Box','off');
figure;
set(gcf,'color','w');
scatter(Age2,Lb(:,i),'k.');
set(gca,'Box','off');
[R_age(i,1), p_age(i,1)] = AssessAgeEffect(Age2,Lm(:,i));
[R_age(i,2), p_age(i,2)] = AssessAgeEffect(Age2,Lb(:,i));
[R_age_abs(i,1), p_age_abs(i,1)] = AssessAgeEffect(Age2,abs(Lm(:,i)));
[R_age_abs(i,2), p_age_abs(i,2)] = AssessAgeEffect(Age2,abs(Lb(:,i)));
end
% For gender
for i = 1:n_comps
figure;
tmp_scale = max(abs(Lm(:,i)));
tmp_scale2 = max(abs(Lb(:,i)));
subplot(1,2,1);
boxplot(Lm(Gender2==0,i));
ylim([-tmp_scale,tmp_scale]);
subplot(1,2,2);
boxplot(Lm(Gender2==1,i));
ylim([-tmp_scale,tmp_scale]);
figure;
subplot(1,2,1);
boxplot(Lb(Gender2==0,i));
ylim([-tmp_scale2,tmp_scale2]);
subplot(1,2,2);
boxplot(Lb(Gender2==1,i));
ylim([-tmp_scale2,tmp_scale2]);
tmpf = figure;
COL{1} = [0.5 0.5 0.5];
COL{2} = [0 0 0];
MakeViolin(Lb(Gender==0,i)',gca,{''},'',COL,1,1);
ylim([-8 8]);
print(tmpf,'-depsc',['VIOLIN_GENDER']);
close(tmpf);
[t_gender(i,1), p_gender(i,1)] = AssessGenderEffect(Gender2,Lm(:,i));
[t_gender(i,2), p_gender(i,2)] = AssessGenderEffect(Gender2,Lb(:,i));
[t_gender_abs(i,1), p_gender_abs(i,1)] = AssessGenderEffect(Gender2,abs(Lm(:,i)));
[t_gender_abs(i,2), p_gender_abs(i,2)] = AssessGenderEffect(Gender2,abs(Lb(:,i)));
end
% For Framewise displacement
FD_Data2 = FD_Data;
FD_Data2(:,isnan(sum(PCA,2)),:) = [];
TemporalMaskAll2 = TemporalMask_All;
TemporalMaskAll2(:,isnan(sum(PCA,2)),:) = [];
% FD is size 1199 x 224; I want to compute the mean FD across non scrubbed
% frames
for s = 1:length(F1b)
for ses = 1:4
FD_s(s,ses) = mean(FD_Data2(~TemporalMaskAll2(:,s,ses),s,ses));
FD_ns(s,ses) = mean(FD_Data2(:,s,ses));
end
end
for i = 1:n_comps
for ses = 1:4
figure;
set(gcf,'color','w');
scatter(FD_s(:,ses),Lm(:,i),'k.');
set(gca,'Box','off');
figure;
set(gcf,'color','w');
scatter(FD_s(:,ses),Lb(:,i),'k.');
set(gca,'Box','off');
[R_FDs(i,ses,1), p_FDs(i,ses,1)] = AssessAgeEffect(FD_s(:,ses),Lm(:,i));
[R_FDs(i,ses,2), p_FDs(i,ses,2)] = AssessAgeEffect(FD_s(:,ses),Lb(:,i));
[R_FDs_abs(i,ses,1), p_FDs_abs(i,ses,1)] = AssessAgeEffect(FD_s(:,ses),abs(Lm(:,i)));
[R_FDs_abs(i,ses,2), p_FDs_abs(i,ses,2)] = AssessAgeEffect(FD_s(:,ses),abs(Lb(:,i)));
end
end
%% 20. Another prediction attempt
% n_subtrain = floor(0.8*936);
% n_subtest = 936-n_subtrain;
%
% idx = randperm(936);
%
%
% for n = 1:1
%
% Mot_train = MOTION_VAR_trim(idx(1:n_subtrain),:);
% Behav_train = PCA_trim(idx(1:n_subtrain),:);
%
% Mot_test = MOTION_VAR_trim(idx(n_subtrain+1:end),:);
% Behav_test = PCA_trim(idx(n_subtrain+1:end),:);
%
% [U,V,EV,sprob,BS_U,BS_V,Ub_vect,Vb_vect] = RunPLS(Mot_train,Behav_train);
%
% % Size 4 * 951
% LM_test = U(:,1:4)' * Mot_test';
%
% EV(1)*
%
% end
Data_ANOVA = [Lm(:,1)',Lm(:,2)',Lm(:,4)',Lb(:,1)',Lb(:,2)',Lb(:,4)'];
Diag_ANOVA = repmat(Diag',1,6);
Motvsbehav_ANOVA = [ones(1,3*245),2*ones(1,3*245)];
Comp_ANOVA = repmat([ones(1,245),2*ones(1,245),3*ones(1,245)],1,2);
[~,Tab,Stats] = anovan(Data_ANOVA,{Diag_ANOVA',Motvsbehav_ANOVA',Comp_ANOVA'},'model','full');
% How many times do we run the non-parametric case
n_np = 10000;
for null = 1:n_np
tmp_idx = randperm(length(Diag_ANOVA));
tmp_idx2 = randperm(length(Diag_ANOVA));
tmp_idx3 = randperm(length(Diag_ANOVA));
[~,Tab,Stats] = anovan(Data_ANOVA,{Diag_ANOVA(tmp_idx)',Motvsbehav_ANOVA(tmp_idx2)',Comp_ANOVA(tmp_idx3)'},'model','full','display','off');
Tab = Tab(:,6);
Tab_null(:,null) = [Tab{2:8}];
end
F_threshold = prctile(Tab_null,99,2);
c4science · Help