############################################################# # WARNING: THIS FILE HAS NOT BEEN TESTED! # (If you use this file in a simulation, please email me to let me know # if it worked. -Andrew 2012-10, (jewett dot aij at gmail dot com)) ######################################################### # There are two different versions of TIP3P: # # tip3p_1983.lt # The implementation of TIP3P used by CHARMM (I think). # tip3p_2004.lt # The newer Price & Brooks, J. Chem Phys 2004 model # # which uses long-range coulombics ######################################################### # file "tip3p_1983.lt" # # H1 H2 # \ / # O # # I think this is the TIP3P water model used by CHARMM (and AMBER?). See: # Jorgensen, Chandrasekhar, Madura, Impey, Klein, J Chem Phys, 79, 926 (1983) TIP3P_1983 { write_once("In Init") { # -- Default styles (for solo "TIP3P_1983" water) -- units real atom_style full # I'm not sure exactly which cutoffs distances are traditionally used in # in the 1983 "TIP3P" model by Jorgensen model, (used by CHARMM). # (See the Price JCP 2004 paper for a review.) # My first guess was this: # pair_style hybrid lj/charmm/coul/charmm 7.5 8.0 10.0 10.5 # However, in the LAMMPS "peptide" example, they use these parameters: pair_style hybrid lj/charmm/coul/long 8.0 10.0 10.0 # ...alternately, if this does not work, try this: # pair_style hybrid lj/charmm/coul/long 10.0 10.5 10.0 10.5 bond_style hybrid harmonic angle_style hybrid harmonic pair_modify mix arithmetic } write("Data Atoms") { $atom:O $mol:. @atom:O -0.834 0.0000000 0.00000 0.000000 $atom:H1 $mol:. @atom:H 0.417 0.756950327 0.00000 0.5858822766 $atom:H2 $mol:. @atom:H 0.417 -0.756950327 0.00000 0.5858822766 } write_once("Data Masses") { @atom:O 15.9994 @atom:H 1.008 } write("Data Bonds") { $bond:OH1 @bond:OH $atom:O $atom:H1 $bond:OH2 @bond:OH $atom:O $atom:H2 } write("Data Angles") { $angle:HOH @angle:HOH $atom:H1 $atom:O $atom:H2 } write_once("In Settings") { bond_coeff @bond:OH harmonic 450.0 0.9572 angle_coeff @angle:HOH harmonic 55.0 104.52 ######################################################################### #### There are two choices for for the O-O interactions ######################################################################### #### O-O nonbonded interactions # For the 1983 Jorgensen version of TIP3P use: pair_coeff @atom:O @atom:O lj/charmm/coul/charmm 0.1521 3.1507 # For the 2004 Price & Brooks version of TIP3P use: # pair_coeff @atom:O @atom:O lj/charmm/coul/long 0.102 3.188 ######################################################################### #### There are three choices for for the O-H and H-H interactions ######################################################################### #### 1) CHARMM uses an arithmetic mixing-rule for the O-H sigma parameter pair_coeff @atom:H @atom:H lj/charmm/coul/charmm 0.0460 0.4000 pair_coeff @atom:O @atom:H lj/charmm/coul/charmm 0.0836 1.7753 #arithmetic ######################################################################### #### 2) OPLS-AA uses geometric a mixing-fule for the O-H sigma parameter, #### If you want to use this, uncomment the following two lines: # pair_coeff @atom:H @atom:H lj/charmm/coul/charmm 0.0460 0.4000 # pair_coeff @atom:O @atom:H lj/charmm/coul/charmm 0.0836 1.1226 #geometric ######################################################################### #### 3) The original Jorgensen 1983 parameterization has no OH or HH # lennard-jones interactions. (?? I think ??) # For this behavior, uncomment these lines: # pair_coeff @atom:H @atom:H lj/charmm/coul/charmm 0.00 0.4000 # pair_coeff @atom:O @atom:H lj/charmm/coul/charmm 0.00 1.7753 ######################################################################### # Define a group for the tip3p water molecules: group tip3p type @atom:O @atom:H # Optional: Constrain the angles and distances. # (Most implementations use this, but it is optional.) fix fShakeTIP3P tip3p shake 0.0001 10 100 b @bond:OH a @angle:HOH # (Remember to "unfix" fShakeTIP3P during minimization.) } } # "TIP3P_1983" water molecule type # (note to self:) # In the LAMMPS "peptide" example, these (nearly identical) parameters were used # and they left the O-H parameters to be determined by the default mixing rules #pair_style lj/charmm/coul/long 8.0 10.0 10.0 #pair_coeff @atom:H @atom:H 0.046 0.400014 0.046 0.400014 #pair_coeff @atom:O @atom:O 0.1521 3.15057 0.1521 3.15057 #angle_style charmm #angle_coeff @angle:HOH 55.0 104.52 0.0 0.0